Tipsa en vän om denna artikel:
Till:
Från:

Learning for a test, not for life


Gabriel Sabah, Emma Blomqvist, Tiba Gate, Loris L’Abbate, Kenay Pathoumthong, Julien André 2026-04-23

Two students, Ana Silva and Louis Wampach, looking at career brochures at the SYV-torget, exploring their options for life after secondary school.<span data-teams="true"> </span>

Two students, Ana Silva and Louis Wampach, looking at career brochures at the SYV-torget, exploring their options for life after secondary school.

 


Schools in both Sweden and Luxembourg say they prepare students for the future. But students are starting to question whether either system is keeping a pace with reality.
- The school program is slow and we won’t learn about it for about 20 years, says Louis , 17, a student in Luxembourg, talking about how his school handles AI.

Sweden and Luxembourg take different approaches to education. In Luxembourg, studens follow a theoretical curriculum built around preparing them for university. In Sweden, schools offer both vocational programs and university-prepation tracks with more flexibility.

- Swedish education prepares students for immediate work. In Luxembourg, you learn more theory, you learn how to learn, says Louis Wampach. 

His classmate Ana Silva, 16, agrees that the system is demanding but feels something is missing.

- We learn a lot, a lot, a lot, and the teachers are more strict, she says. If she could change one thing, her answer is direct, to try to work, instead of only learning.

Vilma Eriksson, 26, a study and career counsellor at Westerlundska gymnasiet, has a clear take about AI.

- You have to dare to use AI. If students are afraid of it and do not use it, there will be problems, she says.

Louis describes a different reality in Luxembourg. Teachers reprimand AI use rather than teaching students how to think about it.

- We are not really learning about the dangers of AI, he says.

Both systems share the same gap. Neither of them prepares students for a job market where AI is already changing what skills actually matter

Vilma’s wish for her students is simple.

- Dare to trust that students take their own responsibility, she says.

For Louise and Ana, the answer is the same: more practice, less theory.

Three voices, two countries, one shared conclusion. Schools are moving too slowly for the world their students are about to enter.

 


Tipsa en v�n Skriv ut



Between Scroll and Truth: How media shapes democracy in Sweden and Luxemburg


In an age where information is endless, but trust is fragile, the way students consume media is reshaping democracy. From classrooms in Sweden to cafes in Luxembourg, the question is no longer just...

Läs mer

Learning for a test, not for life

Two students, Ana Silva and Louis Wampach, looking at career brochures at the SYV-torget, exploring their options for life after secondary school.<span data-teams="true"> </span>

Schools in both Sweden and Luxembourg say they prepare students for the future. But students are...

Läs mer
There is a big difference between the grading systems in Luxembourg and Sweden.

What is the difference between the Swedish and Luxembourgish grading system?

Sweden and Luxembourg have two very different grading systems. In Sweden, a scale from A to F is...

Läs mer
Lycee Hubert Clement in Luxemburg 

School of the Future – A Comparison Between Sweden and Luxembourg

School systems can look very different depending on which country you are in, and students’...

Läs mer

Transport to and from school – How does Sweden and Luxembourg compare?

WGYnytt
Ansvarig utgivare:   Charlotta Hemlin
Webmaster:   Charlotta Hemlin
Redaktion:   Maja , Charlotta, Max, Max, Linus, Linus , Linus, Simon, Lisa, Ludde, Meja, Ellen, Tilde, Felicia
Mest lästa
Sök Sökhjälp
Publicerade
Arkiv